首页> 外文OA文献 >Detection of ALK-Positive non-small-cell lung cancers on cytological specimens: High accuracy of immunocytochemistry with the 5A4 clone
【2h】

Detection of ALK-Positive non-small-cell lung cancers on cytological specimens: High accuracy of immunocytochemistry with the 5A4 clone

机译:在细胞学标本上检测ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌:5A4克隆可实现高精度的免疫细胞化学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is often diagnosed by cytology, necessitating predictive molecular marker analyses on cytological specimens. The gold standard for detection of predictive anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangements is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but FISH is both expensive and often challenging to interpret. The aim of our study was to investigate the accuracy of ALK immunocytochemistry (ICC) on cytological specimens of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs).\udMETHODS: Forty-one cytological specimens with available ALK FISH results were retrospectively analyzed with the 5A4 monoclonal antibody (Novocastra; Leica Biosystems) on a fully automated slide stainer. The specimens were enriched for ALK FISH-positive NSCLCs (14 of 41; 34.1%). Evaluation of the ICC staining was performed blinded to the FISH results. The staining intensity and the percentage of stained cancer cells were recorded. Any ICC staining was regarded as a positive result. The ALK ICC results were compared with the FISH results. In case of a discrepancy the ICC-stained slide and the FISH signals were reviewed.\udRESULTS: ICC was evaluable on 40 of 41 specimens. Fifteen of 40 NSCLCs (37.5%) were ALK ICC-positive, with staining of the majority of cancer cells (median 100%; mean 82.3%). Twelve of the ICC-positive NSCLCs (80.0%) showed an intense staining (3+). Compared with the ALK FISH results, only one NSCLC was false-negative, and one false-positive by ICC, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for ALK ICC compared with ALK FISH were 93.3%, 96.0%, 93.3%, and 96%, respectively.\udCONCLUSION: ALK ICC is highly accurate for detecting ALK-rearranged NSCLCs.
机译:简介:肺癌通常通过细胞学诊断,因此需要对细胞学标本进行预测性分子标记分析。检测预测性间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)重排的金标准是荧光原位杂交(FISH),但FISH既昂贵又难以解释。我们的研究目的是研究ALK免疫细胞化学(ICC)在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLCs)细胞学标本中的准确性。\ udMETHODS:用5A4回顾性分析了41个具有ALK FISH结果的细胞学标本。全自动幻灯片染色仪上的单克隆抗体(Novocastra; Leica Biosystems)。标本富含ALK FISH阳性NSCLC(41个中的14个; 34.1%)。对ICC染色的评估对FISH结果不了解。记录染色强度和染色癌细胞的百分比。任何ICC染色均视为阳性结果。将ALK ICC结果与FISH结果进行了比较。如果有差异,则检查ICC染色的载玻片和FISH信号。\ ud结果:41个样本中有40个的ICC可以评估。 40例NSCLC中有15例(37.5%)的ALK ICC阳性,大多数癌细胞均染色(中值100%;平均82.3%)。 ICC阳性NSCLC中有十二个(80.0%)表现出强烈的染色(3+)。与ALK FISH结果相比,ICC分别仅将一个NSCLC假阴性和一个假阳性。与ALK FISH相比,ALK ICC的敏感性,特异性和阳性和阴性预测值分别为93.3%,96.0%,93.3%和96%。\结论:ALK ICC对检测ALK重排的NSCLC具有很高的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号